It sometimes feels as if no aspect of American midcentury modern design has been left unconsidered, unexhibited, unreissued. But there is undiscovered territory. You’re sitting on it.
My latest for T on Knoll Textiles, 1945-2010. Read the rest here, or in the magazine this weekend.
(via High Fiber - NYTimes.com)
Design Observer: The Anti-Monograph

A few weeks ago Mark Lamster explored the future of the architectural monograph. Here Alexandra Lange takes up the topic, arguing that the new monograph by Studio Gang is a very contemporary effort to negotiate the temptations and contradictions of the genre: to feed the star machinery and yet resist it at the same time.
Read my take on Studio Gang’s first book, Reveal, here.
Related: Fast Company Co. blog on Studio Gang’s Bruce Mau-designed website. Images of the Gang office (showing non-blurry people) in Architect.
Lake Effect

Neighboring estates in this suburb of Chicago often announce their presence with showy turrets or columned façades, but Cascade House, a lakeside residence designed by New York architecture firm Peter Gluck and Partners, makes a more discreet impression. From its front drive, all one sees is a stack of two glass boxes: one transparent, one translucent. The rest of this home—true to its name—drops out of view, gently terracing down toward the waters of Lake Michigan.
I wrote about
a new house in Chicago by
Peter Gluck and Partners for April’s Architectural Digest. Slideshow
here.
And no, I didn’t actually get to go there. Sigh.
How Do You Solve a Problem Like the Eameses?

I don’t know what to do with this book. The Story of Eames Furniture, by Marilyn Neuhart with John Neuhart (Gestalten, 2010), is a labor of love, a two-part, richly-illustrated history of some of the most famous modern chairs in the world. To reject it seems harsh. It contains fascinating tales of false starts and under-known design careers, what could be a separate book of clever mid-century magazine covers, furniture catalogs, and abstract photographic odes to mass-production. And yet I was unable to enjoy it. It is the kind of book that the design blogs love, picking out 10 fabulous images, glorying in its heft entirely in the abstract. Another chance to cite the Eameses! But as a real thing and as a work of history, it is less than the sum of its pages.
Read the rest at Design Observer.

Arts & Architecture, 1946: Eames plywood furniture.
Change Observer: Dan Wood Q&A

On Change Observer today, my interview with Dan Wood of WORK Architecture Company, on his firm’s design for New York’s first Edible Schoolyard (now underway), the history of cities and food, and how Ebenezer Howard could be updated for the 21 Century.
If you ask a bunch of strangers to help you build an architectural folly, you are going to get architecture students. But if you ask a bunch of strangers to plant something you get ten times more than you ever wanted. Gardening is really exciting for people and creates a whole different kind of community spirit.
That’s one of the things we try to get across in the PF1 book. It started out as a project of ideas. It ended up a project about people. Everybody donated their thinking. That New York Times article came out and the next day Michael Grady Robertson, from the Queens County Farm, contacted us and said, “I am an organic farmer and I am in the city. Give me a call.” He was in the process of transforming that into a model sustainable farm. Two thirds of our plants were grown there.
Read the rest here.
GourmetLive: The Architecture of Food

Luckily for me, since I don’t own an iPad (or an iPhone, for that matter, which has begun to make me seem like a freak) my first story for GourmetLive is now online. When asked if there was anything to write about design and food this instantly came to mind.
Jam-making jams, fertilized grow pockets, edible schoolyards, skyscraper farms. Every day my Twitter feed, nominally devoted to design, architecture and media, brings me a stream of architectural platings. I see packaging that becomes a food bowl, sidewalks that sprout, bananas with logos. Right behind the question Why Design Now?—the theme of this year’s National Design Triennial—appears the question What to Eat Now? And designers seem to be throwing themselves at the answer for many of the same reasons. Now that we know we produce too much waste, now that aesthetics are suspect, now that we must compost or perish, how do design and architecture retool themselves for less, or better, or tastier consumption?
Well, we all have to eat.
Read the rest of The Architecture of Food here.

And since, as Khoi Vinh just pointed out, iPad apps aren’t linky. Let me provide some. The main projects I discuss aren’t brand new: Coolhaus, Edible Schoolyard New York, EATLACMA, Marije Vogelzang, but I felt no one had yet written about why such disparate design practices have taken up with food (and not just on GOOD). The short answer is, we all love it. Except for the parents with an unhealthy relationship to ice cream, juice and chocolate milk.
